2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: The 2010 Honda Fit, also sold as Honda Jazz, is a five-door B-segment supermini or subcompact vehicle produced and sold by Honda since 2001 and now in its fourth generation. Sold globally and produced at ten plants in eight countries, sales reached almost 5 million by mid-2013.
The Toyota Yaris is a supermini/subcompact vehicle marketed by Toyota since 1999, succeeding the Toyota Starlet and Toyota Tercel. Up to 2019, Toyota had adopted the Yaris nameplate on export variants of different Japanese-market models, with some markets getting the very vehicles under the Toyota Echo title through 2005. Beginning in 2020, the Yaris nameplate started to be employed in Japan, which succeeded the Toyota Vitz nameplate.
Let’s start the comparison of the 2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris and find out what these Superminis or Subcomact Vehicles have to offer as well as where they compete with each other in various aspects you are going to find below.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Overview
“Fit” spelled backward is essential “tiff,” and that’s something the 2010 Honda Fit has never had — a serious dispute with any of its competitors in the affordable small hatchback section. The Fit is so simple the best of its class that there’s nothing to battle over. It has the most varied interior by far, and its driving dynamics are excellent as well. It’s rare to discover a fugitive champion in this era of automotive equality, but the Fit is just that.
Inside is where the Fit lights. Ergonomics are excellent, and clarity is elegant gratitude to Fit’s friendly greenhouse. A telescoping steering wheel is standard, and a navigation system is available. There’s sufficient room for grown-up passengers in both front and back, and as always, the Fit’s backseat — the “Magic Seat” in Honda-speak — is uniquely useful. The seatbacks collapse down without needing the rear headrests to be excluded, starting up a huge 57 cubic feet of freight space, sufficient to rival some compact crossover SUVs. You can also flip the seat cushion up to build a tall cargo area between the first and second lines.
In the engine bay remains a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine that has powered the Fit since its 2007 appearance. Various under-hood changes were created when the Fit was redesigned the current year, though, and the result is the noticeably peppier power delivery. The manual transmission model is especially active, recording a nice 0-60-mph race of 8.9 seconds, though the base Fit with the automatic is noticeably slower. And while the Fit’s EPA fuel economy ratings (29-31 mpg in blended driving) are somewhat disappointing in the knowledge of the car’s small weight and dimensions, this is yet one of the most fuel-efficient vehicles on the street.
The 2010 Honda Fit technically does have some rival(s). The Nissan Cube can’t continue a light to the Honda’s driving dynamics or interior functionality, but its unique styling will certainly gain over some customers. The Scion xD and Toyota Yaris would be deemed suitably proficient economy hatchbacks if the Fit didn’t exist. Suzuki‘s all-wheel-drive SX4 is another contender, but it’s held back by obscure fuel economy. Only the quick Ford Fiesta seems set to provide the Fit a run for its money. Honda likes to say that its Fit is “go,” and we have to admit — this is the best of the economy hatchback section.
As far as economy vehicles go, the expectations are admittedly pretty low. With the economy being the central focus, this section has traditionally been saddled with unimpressive performance, cut-rate interiors, and narrow standard-features records. As the class grows, the frequently strong conflict has required companies to produce more customer attraction. As such, numerous of today’s entry-level vehicles appear almost upscale hallmarks and utilities, along with proper elegance and performance.
The Toyota Yaris represents this economy-car succession. Started a few years ago, it gives a stylish and spacious interior, average performance, and a points table that will suitable please most consumers buying in this section. For 2010, Toyota raises the ante just somewhat, by adding balance and traction control on all Yaris models. Other variations involve the removal of the S trim level for a simpler purchasing manner and the availability of a manual transmission on five-door hatchback models.
These additions support the Yaris’ standing as a reliable economy-car option. The 1.5-liter, 106-horsepower engine isn’t running to wow you with swift acceleration, but its fuel economy — up to 36 mpg on the highway — just sway. Other assets add a pleasant drive, easy-to-drive dynamics, the availability of three frame styles (a sedan and two hatchbacks), fair pricing, playful styling, and Toyota’s respect for reliability.
However, when piled against competitors like the Honda Fit, Kia Rio, Nissan Versa, and Scion xD, the Yaris is committed to midpack status. The Yaris’ freight volume blanches in connection to that given by these competitors. The Toyota also requires the Honda Fit’s fun-to-drive character and varied cargo arrangements, while the Scion contains more interest to the younger people with its fashionable styling and youth-oriented highlights. In the end, the 2010 Toyota Yaris continues a conscious option, but the aggressive field takes the advantage.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Models & Changes
The 2010 Honda Fit is a subcompact four-door hatchback obtainable in two trim levels: base and Sport. Base Fits appear standard with 15-inch steel wheels, air-conditioning, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, complete power accessories, and a four-speaker sound system with CD/MP3 player and extra audio input. The Fit Sport reckons 16-inch alloy wheels, foglights, lower body extensions, a rear spoiler, cruise control, map lights, a driver armrest, and an improved audio system with six speakers and a USB port. A navigation system is possible, but only on the Sport.
The 2010 Toyota Yaris is a subcompact economy vehicle that is available as a three-door hatchback, five-door hatchback, and four-door sedan. Standard highlights incorporate 14-inch steel wheels, irregular windshield wipers, air-conditioning, four-way-adjustable front seats, and a tilt steering wheel. The sedan combines several items over the hatchbacks, like a tachometer, a height-adjustable driver seat, and a remote trunk relief. Speakers are pre-wired, but radio is not given as standard gear.
Most choices are classified into regular units with only several stand-alone hallmarks available. The Convenience pack sums 60/40-split rear seats (slide/recline for the hatchbacks), a rear window wiper for sedan models, and a CD/MP3 player with an extra audio jack and satellite radio. The Powerpack adds the Convenience pack details and tacks on power accessories and keyless entrance. The Sport package combines the Power package with exterior styling improvements, 15-inch wheels, foglights, iPod integration, sport seats, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob. Stand-alone choices add 15-inch alloy wheels, foglights, and cruise control.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Performance & MPG
The front-wheel-drive Honda Fit comes with a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine that delivers 117 horsepower and 106 pound-feet of torque. A five-speed manual transmission is regular and a five-speed automatic is voluntary. On Fit Sports, the automatic appears with manual shift control via steering-wheel-mounted paddles. Dispatch meters vary broadly depending on the transmission: The stick shift’s great for about 9.5-second races to 60 mph, but the base Fit with the automatic needs a snooze-inducing 11.0 seconds.
EPA fuel economy measures stand at 27 mpg city/33 mpg highway and 29 mpg mixed for all Fits with the manual transmission, while the Fit Sport provided with the automatic is estimated at 27/33/30. More traditional shift programming on base models provided with the automatic yields an excellent 28/35/31 rating.
The front-wheel-drive 2010 Toyota Yaris is powered by a 1.5-liter inline-4 engine with a production of 106 hp and 103 pound-feet of torque. A five-speed manual transmission is standard, with a four-speed automatic available as an alternative. In a recent analysis, a Yaris with an automatic transmission took a comfortable 10.7 seconds to touch 60 mph — which is on the slow side, related to the rival(s). The manual transmission gives just a bit more energy.
The Yaris’ class-leading fuel economy is one of its biggest selling points. At an EPA-estimated 29 mpg city/36 mpg highway and 32 mpg mixed, the manual-equipped Yaris drinks less gas than most of the rival(s). Opting for the automatic reductions of these numbers to 29/25/31 mpg.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Safety
Standard safety gear for the 2010 Honda Fit adds antilock disc brakes, front-seat side airbags, full-length side-curtain airbags, and active front head restraints. Fit Sports can be provided with a balance control system, but curiously, it is only available on models with the navigation system. Braking performance is hardly enough for this section, as a Fit Sport, we examined yelled to a standstill from 60 mph in 134 feet. In the government crash examination, the Fit earned a complete five stars for frontal collisions, while in the side-impact examination it earned five stars for front-passenger protection and four for rear passenger protection. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave Fit it’s top rating of “Great” for both frontal-offset and side impacts.
Standard safety innovations incorporate antilock brakes and side curtain airbags, as well as friction and stability control. In government examination, the Yaris sedan obtained four out of five stars for frontal- and side-impact protection for all residents. In frontal collision examinations, the three- and five-door hatchbacks obtained five stars for driver protection and four stars for passenger protection; side-impact inspections profited five stars for front passenger protection and three stars for those in the rear. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety granted the Yaris sedan its highest score of “Good” for frontal- and side-impact protection for all residents.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Driving
Unlike other subcompacts, the 2010 Honda Fit is satisfying to ride. With its 2,500-pound curb weight, fine steering response, and willing (if slightly boomy) 1.5-liter four, the Fit continues a welcome shot of driving comfort to the everyday commute. Working with the manual transmission gets complete support of the Fit’s charming character, though the Fit Sport’s available automatic with shift paddles is a viable alternative. The base Fit’s automatic substances a goodly amount of energy from the engine, though it gives the most excellent fuel economy in the lineup. In normal driving, the Fit handles tightly, but there’s a decent volume of street sound on the highway.
On the open street, the 2010 Toyota Yaris seems thick, while in the city, the light and nimble steering effect parking-lot maneuvers a breeze. The engine is soft when driven carefully, but it can grow somewhat noisy and buzzy when driven harder. Power is satisfactory for joining and crossing on the highway but is not at all satisfied for more vivacious driving (nor is the lack of steering feeling). As a practical everyday passenger vehicle, though, the Yaris should satisfy the requirements of most drivers.
2010 Honda Fit vs 2010 Toyota Yaris: Interior
The contemporary Fit appears more like a real vehicle than its even more pint-sized ancestor. Taller drivers will be at comfort, as the standard tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel performs for a pleasant driving environment. Rear passenger space is pretty remarkable for a compact hatchback — two grown-ups can drive-in back for an extensive trip without grievance. Interior elements are just so-so, but all major controls are prominently identified and straightforward to utilize.
The rear “Magic Seat” can be configured in an assortment of styles, and it’s a fundamental component of the Fit’s attractiveness. The rear seatbacks collapse perfectly flat at the pull of a lever, and the headrests needn’t be eliminated first. You can also flip up the rear seat cushion to produce a tall freight space right behind the front seats. The front passenger seat also collapses down, producing openings for objects up to 7 feet, 9 inches in length. The maximum cargo capacity is a scarcely trustworthy 57.3 cubic feet.
Both 2010 Toyota Yaris hatchbacks highlight narrow rear seats, but the voluntary slide/recline function joins a bit more support to compensate. The sedan averages 20 inches extended than the hatchbacks, giving a fairly roomy cabin for a subcompact. Styling varies lightly between the sedan and the hatchbacks, with the sedan being extra sedate.
All Yaris models highlight a center-mounted instrument panel that has drawn many criticisms from our readers over the years. These gauges need a look away from the street to read them, and clarity is further hindered by the reality that the faces are not angled toward the driver. Other faults cover the absence of a telescoping steering wheel and driver seat height adjustment.
Related to sedan models, Yaris hatchbacks give several benefits when it arrives to design and storage space. They highlight three gloveboxes to the sedan’s single bin, and they also introduce a chic, small capital stack that narrows down around to a point. With the rear seats up, each of the two hatchbacks gives just 10 cubic feet of baggage space, about half of what a Fit can hold. Reducing the rear seats shows 25.7 cubic feet of freight room, which is again little for the hatchback class. The sedan gives 12.9 cubic feet of baggage capacity less than racing sedans like the Ford Focus and Nissan Versa.
Side by Side Comparison
|Features||2010 Honda Fit||2010 Toyota Yaris|
|Engine||Gas I4||Gas I4|
|Horsepower||117 hp @ 6600 rpm||106 hp @ 6000 rpm|
|Torque||106 ft-lb @ 4800 rpm||103 ft-lb @ 4200 rpm|
|Steering||Power Steering||Power Steering|
|Drivetrain||Front-Wheel Drive||Front-Wheel Drive|
|Transmission||5-speed automatic transmission w/grade logic control 5-speed manual transmission||4-speed automatic transmission w/OD, super electronic control transmission (Super-ECT) 5-speed manual transmission|
|Fuel Consumption: City||7.1 – 7.2 L/100 km||6.9 – 7.0 L/100 km|
|Fuel Consumption: Highway||5.5 – 5.7 L/100 km||5.4 – 5.6 L/100 km|
|Fuel Consumption: City/HWY Combined||5.5 – 7.2 L/100 km||5.4 – 7.0 L/100 km|
|Fuel Capacity||40.0 L||42.0 L|
|Brake||Front Disc Rear Drum||Front Disc Rear Drum|
|Front Head Room||1,026 mm||986 – 1,001 mm|
|Front Leg Room||1,049 mm||1,024 – 1,072 mm|
|Front Shoulder Room||1,339 mm||1,306 – 1,311 mm|
|Rear Head Room||991 mm||932 – 963 mm|
|Rear Leg Room||889 mm||859 – 904 mm|
|Rear Shoulder Room||1,303 mm||1,275 – 1,280 mm|
|Wheelbase||2,499 mm||2,461 – 2,550 mm|
|Length, Overall||4,105 mm||3,825 – 4,300 mm|
|Width, Max w/o mirrors||1,694 mm||1,689 – 1,694 mm|
|Height, Overall||1,524 mm||1,461 – 1,524 mm|
|Min Ground Clearance||150 mm||140 – 147 mm|
|Base Curb Weight||1,119 – 1,176 kg||1,043 – 1,082 kg|
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com