Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S Coupe- Car Comparison
Why should people go for buying an SUV? Well, there can be two main reasons: a lofty driving position and the idea that your shiny new motor is able to cross the Sahara. However, the reality is that there would be a struggle to free itself from a muddy car park.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
However, some people just looking for the moon on a stick. This further demanding sports car– performance from their practical two-tonne family 4×4. Furthermore, that leads you to create a new category for such machines. Yes, technically, that stands for ‘sports utility vehicle’, but you must admit that the condensed version trips off the tongue rather nicely.
Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S Coupe
One of the favorite sports SUVs is the Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S. Moreover, it’s powered by a thunderous 503bhp twin-turbo 4.0-liter V8, thus making it the quickest SUV. However, the new Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio could have the GLC’s measure, given that it shares its underpinnings with the superb Giulia. It further has an equally powerful twin-turbo 2.9-liter V6 under its bonnet.
Safety
When going off a steep, off-road slope, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio standard Hill Descent Control allows you to move down safely. Moreover, The AMG GLC 63 Coupe is unable to offer Hill Descent Control.
Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S Coupe
Further, In order to help make backing safer, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio cross-path warning system.
It thereby uses wide-angle radar in the rear bumper to alert the driver to vehicles approaching from the side. It further thus helps the driver avoid collisions/ crash. Besides this, The AMG GLC 63 Coupe doesn’t offer a cross-path warning system.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Moreover, Both the Stelvio Quadrifoglio and the AMG GLC 63 Coupe have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags. It moreover has front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensions, height-adjustable front shoulder belts.
It is further inclusive of four-wheel antilock brakes, all-wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems. this is further to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind-spot warning systems, rear-view cameras, and available lane departure warning systems.
Engine
The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 is able to produce 36 more horsepower (505 vs. 469) than the AMG GLC 63 Coupe’s standard 4.0 turbo V8. Moreover, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 is able to produce 2 more horsepower (505 vs. 503) than the AMG GLC63 S Coupe’s standard 4.0 turbo V8.
Fuel Economy and Range
Above all, On the EPA test cycle, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is able to deliver better fuel mileage than the AMG GLC63 S Coupe (17 city/23 hwy vs. 15 city/22 hwy).
Further an engine control system that is capable to shut down. Further, half of the engine’s cylinders help improve the Stelvio Quadrifoglio fuel efficiency. Furthermore, The AMG GLC 63 Coupe doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.
Chassis
Further, on the basis of testing by Car and Driver, while cruising at 70 MPH, the interior of the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is quieter than the AMG GLC63 S Coupe (66 vs. 67 dB).
Passenger Space
The Stelvio Quadrifoglio consists of 1.3 inches more front headroom. It is further .2 inches more front shoulder room and .6 inches more rear headroom than the AMG GLC 63 Coupe.
Recommendations
Above all, Both cars are perfect in their own skin. Further, The qualities and features of each and every model are entirely different and call for testing the both. It is though difficult to decide and analyze which one is better. Moreover, The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard headlight washers that are able to keep headlight output high. The AMG GLC 63 Coupe doesn’t offer headlight washers.
If you are looking to buy Used Cars, Machinery, Bus, Trucks, Parts from Japan. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Please visit our website: www.japanesecartrade.com
Check more useful blog pages: blog.japanesecartrade.com/blog