Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: The Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class, formerly Mercedes-Benz M-Class, is a mid-size luxury SUV manufactured by the German carmaker Mercedes-Benz since 1997. In terms of size, it is placed in among the smaller GLC-Class (based on the C-Class) and the larger GLS-Class, the following with which it shares platforms.
The Cadillac XT5 (short for Crossover Touring 5) is a compact luxury / D-segment crossover SUV produced by General Motors. It was presented at both the Dubai Motor Show and LA Auto Show in November 2015. The XT5 succeeded the Cadillac SRX crossover when it was begun in spring 2016. It is the second model to practice Cadillac‘s unique alphanumeric classification scheme (after the CT6) and the original in the Crossover Touring (XT) series. The XT5 is produced at GM’s Spring Hill Manufacturing plant.
Let’s start the comparison of the Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5 and find out what these Vehicles have to offer as well as where they compete with each other in various aspects you are going to find below.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Overview
There’s much to love about the M-class—the first-rate cabin, advanced tech, and towing strength—but those exploring something sporty should continue looking. The base setup is a 302-hp 3.5-liter V-6 with rear-wheel drive for the Sunbelt set; 4MATIC all-wheel drive is voluntary.
Other engines incorporate a 200-hp 2.1-liter turbo-diesel four and a 329-hp, twin-turbo 3.0-liter V-6, both with 4MATIC. Don’t anticipate the M-class to be handy off-road, but it can undertake critical weather with its 4MATIC all-wheel drive.
As a compact luxury SUV, the Cadillac XT5 intends for wide appeal. Sadly, it lacks some essential characteristics required to compete favorably against majestic vehicles like the BMW X3, Mercedes-AMG GLC43, and Volvo XC60. The XT5’s cabin is roomy and comfy and it gives a clean drive, but its appeal is otherwise restricted. Customers can pick from either a turbocharged four-cylinder or a V-6 engine, but packing up the XT5 with choices immediately launches its price tag to the Porsche Macan empire—an field where the XT5 is even more outside of its bottom.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Interior
There was a time during large SUVs were rated on their strength to pull massive weights over dangerous cliff paths or traverse deserts without surrendering to the components. Now, they’re created to be seamless, quiet, large vehicles for the social and domestic comfort of the average class, and the Mercedes M-Class is no various. This indicates that, inside, they must emit an ambiance deserving of Blohm & Voss.
Notwithstanding serving the entry-level M-Class adventure, the ML 250 receives the lifestyle trick about right. It lacks the aloof, art deco spectacle of a Range Rover and the implied sportiness of a Cayenne, but Mercedes’ solemn design and sober color schemes make the ML purposeful enough to race.
Switchgear’s Familiar DNA
The switchgear’s familiar DNA has also been estimated up to SUV size rather well, aided no end by a dashboard that projects with the broad-shouldered appearance and engaging trim stitching.
Certainly, the three-pointed star on an especially premium steering wheel serves to place you in the best egotistical frame of spirit, and the front seats’ endless adjustability assures that the driver can pick between perching in the crow’s nest or hunkering down.
There’s 34mm more elbow place upfront, but with one arm habitually rested on the elevated middle console, it’s the 25mm extension in the rear that is apparently of more worth. Mercedes doesn’t provide the ML with a suitably designed middle seat, but there’s still loads of place to play taxi to a third rear passenger.
Lots of room for baggage, too: the boot is more prominent than a Cayenne’s or an X5’s, and with the seats dropped to show 2010 liters of floor-to-ceiling area, its clutter capacity is only surpassed by the Range Rover Sport and Audi Q7.
Passenger range is adequate, and comforts are as grand as anticipated from a current Cadillac. The elements utilized everywhere in the XT5’s cabin seem upscale when considered separately, but when observed as a unity, the outcome is a design that looks unfocused. The interior’s design is excellent, and the driving environment is pleasant.
And for 2020, the XT5 gained more reliable interior elements, advanced ergonomics, and upgraded hallmarks such as the latest digital gauge cluster. Even luxury crossovers should be effective, and the XT5 shines in this section. Above-average freight space, loads of boxes for stashing smaller objects, and easy-to-fold rear seat support this Caddy to easily convert from luxury cruiser to freight king. The XT5’s baggage holds housed an extraordinary 10 carry-on bags with the rear seat in position. Once collapsed, we provide 24 carry-ons.
Base variants have artificial leather on the power-adjustable front seats and rear seats, while real hides grow on the Premium Luxury and Sport trims. The front seats are comfy and appear standard with heaters, a friendly and toasty touch. Rear-seat passengers have adequate space, though three against maybe a little snug. Conveniently, row two can be moved ahead to clear up more freight room. The highest volume reaches 63 cubic feet with the rear seats collapsed down, which is a little low for a carrier this measurement but is unquestionably useful. Interior trim is accurate no matter what you spend, though Premium Luxury models can be covered up with more detailed semi-aniline leather and superb open-pore wood trim that inexplicably continues to the steering wheel hub.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Engine & Performance
Its 93bhp per liter isn’t unusual by current diesel standards, but it still needs some getting used to for those of us who remember (and it wasn’t so long ago) when 100bhp per liter was estimated at the sharp end for normally aspirated petrol cars.
But the 201bhp peak isn’t only what performs this 2.1-liter engine enough in the 2310kg (as tested) ML; it’s also the excellent 369lb-ft of torque, a wide range of it, and the strength of the seven-speed auto ’box to create the most of the energy and torque transfer.
It still leaves the ML 250 viewing a touch malnourished contrasted with some of its bigger-engined competitors, but it would be rude to imply that an 8.8sec 0-60mph dash in a car like this is lacking.
In-gear versatility is nice if you hold on to the gearbox’s ratios via its steering wheel paddles; 50-70mph in seventh, for instance, uses a decent time of 11.0sec. But even with the gearbox hence chosen, you can kick past holding on to a ratio if you’re decided to provide the carpet a hard time. Flat out through the gears, the same 50-70mph benchmark can be completed in a quick 5.8sec.
The real advantage, though, is believed at the fuel pump. To our knowledge, no other SUV of this size and performance will present the overall economy into the mid-30s.
The XT5’s conventional turbocharged four-cylinder produces 237 horsepower and the voluntary V-6 delivers 310 horses. With each engine, it’s no competition for performance-oriented competitors such as the 340-hp Porsche Macan S.
However, the Caddy accumulates up positively toward the Lexus RX350 and the Volvo XC60. In light-footed, day-to-day work, we’ve discovered the Cadillac’s V-6 to be impressively calm and well separated from the cabin. Following heavy throttle, nevertheless, the larger engine’s venom executes itself recognized most critically. Confront a twisty trail and the XT5 can catch it with certainty, although it won’t get the hairs on the back of your throat to stand up even when provided with the voluntary adaptive suspension.
Body roll is well controlled and the XT5 appears solid and established, which is particularly refreshing on large highway slogs. Over rocky ranges of the cracked sidewalk, nevertheless, our analysis vehicle seemed excited and released sharp results to sound throughout the cabin. Steering is precise but needs any physical feedback—another dropped possibility to appeal to enthusiast drivers.
A correctly implemented XT5 can haul up to 3,500 pounds. In all but the base model, Cadillac allows towing assistance characteristics like hitch guidance, hitch guidance with hitch view, and engine cooling.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Fuel Economy
With 44.8mpg maintained (we managed 40.9mpg on our driving run), it is the class leader, and if you prefer to have the voluntary 93-liter tank applied, Mercedes estimates that you could measure up as many as 930 miles among refills.
Although that’s doubtlessly a short promising, the CO2 emissions are laid out in undeniable black and white and they, too, but the ML 250 out in front of the area. At 165g/km, it sees itself in VED band G, three better than its J-banded competitors. That describes a vital annual saving, but from the point of view of showroom tax, it also suggests that setting a Mercedes on the approach is fractionally poorer than the choices.
Front-wheel-drive XT5s with the standard turbocharged four-cylinder gains EPA fuel economy measures of 21 mpg city, 28 mpg highway, and 24 mpg mixed. Moving up to the V-6 falls mpg to 18 cities, 26 highways, and 21 merged. On both models, joining the voluntary all-wheel-drive reduces these measures insignificantly, a tiny permit for continued determination in severe weather. On our 200-mile highway fuel-economy examination route, an all-wheel-drive XT5 with the V-6 engine produced 23 mpg, while a front-wheel-drive model with the turbocharged four-cylinder accomplished 29 mpg.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Exterior
There’s a delightful measure of pragmatism and culture about the new Mercedes ML 250 Bluetec. Higher up in the M-Class range, you can purchase variants of the car filled with state-of-the-art frame technology to improve both on-road and off-road performance.
Height-adjustable air suspension and lockable inter-axle differentials are the typical SUV fare. Adaptive damping and active anti-roll bars most surely aren’t. The ML 250 Bluetec is cast more clearly than its range matches as the frugal, refined, roomy, and classy old-school family Mercedes to effortlessly satisfy your every real-world need.
Following British consumers’ propensity for big wheels on their big SUVs, no wheels weigh less than 19 inches beyond. Those seeing to gain more of a statement can prefer rims up to 21 inches as an option.
The M-Class has the modified C-pillar, which has been a staple highlight of the model since its debut. The D-pillar is, once more, hidden after the glass to decrease the noticeable effect of bulk around the back end. A three-piece spoiler is provided as standard to smooth airflow and decrease resistance.
Outside, busy lines and a hunchback profile often work well, but its lines will bring less consideration than competitors from Volvo, Alfa Romeo, and even Lincoln. Sport variants seem a little more formal, but they handle stiffly with their greater wheels and, honestly, we believe they miss the mark.
The XT5 seems large, blocky, and stocky from the outside. It’s about the equivalent period as a Lincoln Nautilus, its leading American rival. Although, the XT5 doesn’t cleverly slot into any class. It’s larger than a BMW X3 and Mercedes GLC-Class, but more diminutive than an X5 or GLE-Class. This avoidance of standard size constructions is nothing new for Cadillac, as its sedan has long operated by the identical playbook, including today’s CT4 and CT5.
Cadillac catches the influence of the XT5’s bigness with a broad rear seat, clearly defeating smaller, likewise priced competitors at 39 inches of rear legroom. The rear baggage space is predictably large at 30.2 cubic feet, but the Lincoln Nautilus provides more — an Acura RDX is just about the XT5’s equivalent in freight space. In common, it’s more firmly adjusted with midsize contributions in overall space but undermines those competitors in cost. That leaves Cadillac with a certain value thought to be performed.
Mercedes-Benz M-Class vs Cadillac XT5: Handling
The M-Class, then, rolls on standard coil springs (as on most competitors bar the standard air-suspended Range Rover Sport) with a comfortable, loping gait. Body control is wobblier than you’ll find in a Cayenne or X5 but, by difference, rolling relief is excellent. There are small wind and road sound (which helps to get the engine’s specific snap all the more striking), and at low speeds, the ML steers with surprising grace.
That’s down to a variable-assistance steering set-up that fails its appealing low-speed oiliness as speeds increase, apparently filling the gap with a less supported, bigger feel that’s intended to improve straight-line resistance.
What it does in exercise is to give the M-Class a somewhat contradictory theme: a light-steering, nearly easy-going SUV at lower rates, but one that becomes a less willing and, crucially, less comfortable partner as its pace progress.
Cadillac prefers to recommend that the XT5 is a sporty crossover, but it’s far off the speed of its competitors when it gets to driver action. On the upside, its flexible drive and secluded cabin deliver the XT5 a numerous vehicle for picking up highway miles or solely performing the everyday slog to and from the province. It’s still inside with all of Cadillac’s additional sound dampening, and despite the Sport trim with its more competitive adaptive restraints is apparently tuned with comfort in the thought.
The big torque total is expected to make it seem just as powerful around town as the V6 – and maybe more since that torque comes lower in the rev range. By difference, you demand to get the V6’s revs up into the mid and upper reach before it begins to draw as heavily. If you consider handling, you’ll require the Sport trim. Its intensified “Sport Control AWD” system has torque vectoring skills that not the Luxury nor Premium Luxury trims offer.
It also makes the aforementioned adaptive restraints that continuously adapt to the street but can be manually frozen with Sport mode for less muscular in turns. Ultimately, the Sport prepares a more responsive steering rack that performs it appears that much more flexible — the steering itself is rather senseless, though. None of these works can cover how heavy and large the XT5 appears on the street, and it doesn’t appear as strong and complex when handled promptly as Cadillac’s CT4 and CT5 sport sedans, nor rivals like the Audi Q5, BMW X3, Mercedes GLC or Acura RDX.
Side by Side Comparison
|Features||Mercedes-Benz M-Class||Cadillac XT5|
|Engine||3.5L V6 Gas||2.0L Turbo Inline-4 Gas|
|Horsepower||302 hp @ 6500 rpm||235 hp @ 5000 rpm|
|Torque||273 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm||258 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm|
|Transmission||7-Speed Automatic||9-Speed Automatic|
|Drivetrain||Rear-Wheel Drive||Front-Wheel Drive|
|Curb Weight||4,652 lbs||3,915 lbs|
|Maximum Towing Capacity||6,600 lbs||1,000 lbs|
|Combined Fuel Economy||20 MPG||24 MPG|
|City Fuel Economy||18 MPG||22 MPG|
|Highway Fuel Economy||24 MPG||29 MPG|
|CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year||8.8 Tons/yr||7.4 Tons/yr|
|Fuel Tank Capacity||24.6 gallons||19.4 gallons|
|Cruising Range City||442.8 miles||426.8 miles|
|Cruising Range Highway||590.4 miles||562.6 miles|
|Height||70.7 in||66.1 in|
|Max Width||75.8 in||74.9 in|
|Front Width||64.7 in||64.8 in|
|Rear Width||65.2 in||64.8 in|
|Wheelbase||114.8 in||112.5 in|
|Seating Capacity||5 seater||5 seater|
|Front Seat Leg Room||40.3 in||41.2 in|
|Front Seat Headroom||40.4 in||39.7 in|
|Front Seat Shoulder Room||58.5 in||58.3 in|
|Rear Seat Leg Room||38.4 in||39 in|
|Rear Seat Headroom||38.5 in||38.4 in|
|Rear Seat Shoulder Room||58.4 in||56.3 in|
|Cargo Volume to Seat 1||80.3 ft³||63 ft³|
|Cargo Volume to Seat 2||38.2 ft³||30.2 ft³|
|Wheels Type||Aluminum Wheels||Aluminum Wheels|
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com