Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4: The Nissan X-Trail is a compact crossover SUV car from Japan manufactured by Nissan Motors since 2000. It was one of Nissan’s initial crossover SUVs and was launched about the very time as various other companies’ competing car-based crossovers. At its debut, the X-Trail is located beneath the truck-based Xterra and Pathfinder.
The Suzuki SX4 is a subcompact car and crossover produced together by carmaker Suzuki Japan and Italian carmaker Fiat, marketed since 2006. It was available as a hatchback and sedan, with the past available in both front and four-wheel drive. Further, in 2013, the second generation was begun, named Suzuki SX4 S-Cross — now solely a subcompact crossover SUV car from Japan. The first- and second-generation SX4s were marketed beside one another until 2014. So, the second-generation SX4 has not been sold as a Fiat, and the SX4 sedan was succeeded by the Suzuki Ciaz.
Let’s start the comparison of Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4 and find out what these vehicles have to offer as well as where they compete with each other in various aspects you are going to find below.
Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4: Overview
The X-trail has always maintained its shape like a box over and over the years and very little has changed its shape. Despite so many changes, only a little has been a change. This is a perfect example of an urban vehicle. Also, the look of the car is versatile and has felt in the interiors of this car.
So, the air conditioning is adjustable. The vehicle has an air conditioning vent in the rear portion of the car. This model comes with a 2.0 liter of engine. But there are choices for the buyers. You may also opt for 148 or 170 BHP engines. Furthermore, the suspension system of the X trail makes it superior and gives you a smooth ride.
There are hill ascent and descent systems in the car. So, the suspension and road noises are well contained in it and they do not even reach the cabin. But at the time of traffic, you may feel a bit of a vibration sensation.
SUV Crossover cars from Japan have taken over the world, giving the status of a common off-roader with the aids and comfort of a family hatchback. Recent years have been overlooked by fresh models and renewed lines beyond all companies.
The Suzuki SX4 is a small crossover that predates the famous utility of the term. Originated in 2006, it caught the place of the Liana in showrooms; numerous years later we’re watching tall SUV-Esque cars getting the place of saloons and hatchbacks.
Unlike its earlier short 4x4s, which were based on a separate frame and very focused on off-road capability over support, the SX4 held the drive height and clarity of vehicles but worked mostly with traditional hatchback elements below. Produced in cooperation with Fiat (their variant was marketed as the Sedici), the interior is more European in texture too.
Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4: Interior
Because of its high stance and long wheelbase, the Japanese used cars Nissan X-Trail offers a reasonably impressive amount of interior space, likewise as a much better view. Those that appreciate plenty of space will find their haven in Nissan X-Trail, which features seating for five adults, albeit smaller adults within the rear.
For a few reasons, the rear center passenger seating position wasn’t equipped with a three-point safety harness. Additionally, it seems that priority was given to cargo space, rather than passenger space, as long-legged adults may find the rear seats somewhat cramped. At the identical time, rear cargo space, even with the rear seats up, is kind of impressive for this class.
Solid Framing and a High Body
The Nissan X-Trail, in addition to solid framing and a high body, includes most traditional safety features, like dual front airbags and anti-lock braking systems, likewise as electronic brake-force distribution. Still, electronic stability control wasn’t available on the first-generation Nissan X-Trail, which many are also searching for within the family runabout.
The dash section is styled attractively enough and gets spiced up with the aid of decorous aluminum on the air-conditioning, ventilation dials, and middle console. A driver has a clear picture in all areas and the columns on both sides of the windscreen include tiny windows to all but kill the blind spot that the massively increased columns affect on many modern vehicles.
The door mirrors are of an especially large size extra helping clarity to the rear. Also, The steering wheel coordinates for both reach and height plus has controls for the audio system. Facelifted models are a bit different although tiny variations like cushioned armrests on the doors and additional sound covering add to onboard convenience.
Suzuki SX4 comfort levels
The tall aspect generates a spacious cabin with loads of headroom front and rears so assume conventional Suzuki SX4 comfort levels. It’ll carry four adults with comfort, or has to room for three smaller passengers in the back. The drive is pleasant being neither too firm over bad surfaces nor too inclined to roll through curves. Wind, engine, and road sound are all noticeable, but unquestionably not unacceptable so long-distance drives can be gracefully undertaken and the seats give sufficient support, although there’s no lumbar adjustment.
Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4: Exterior
Looking at the Nissan X-Trail, one immediately notices that it’s boxier than most other crossovers on the market. Also, looking at the age, other cars were boxy, but in 2002, it seems almost out of place. It’s not going to be the foremost attractive, but it does warrant a better look. If anything, this might be why X-Trail is so polarizing.
Some see it as a throwback to yesteryear’s designs, while others see it as a down-sized version of a full-size SUV, with all the design of a capable off-roader, but without the high refueling costs typically related to such monsters. On the opposite hand, there are lots of wildly successful SUVs out there that haven’t changed their look in decades.
Opt for the premium Nissan X-Trail Ti, and therefore the trim includes an upgrade to alloy wheels, still fitted with 65-series all-season tires. Those choosing the facility sunroof will find it on the massive size, giving even rear passengers a pleasant view of the sky.
With all the same elements of styling and beauty, the Suzuki SX4 advances at very first sight. Based on the crossover platform, this sedan has a worthy build quality. With a whole dimension of 4490mm (length) x 1735mm (width) x 1560mm (height), it is the largest and biggest saloon in this section. The satisfactory exterior dimension pays good legroom (2500mm) for all five passengers. The front fascia of the car is controlled by a great headlight cluster, curvy bumper with a large and three-part air dam, and mesh grille. There is a front huge windscreen with a regular couple of periodic wipers that gives it semi-cab features.
However, the side profile of the Suzuki SX4 Japan used cars is improved by well-designed doors, body-colored ORVMs, door handles, extended wheel arches, and wide alloy wheels. All entry-level and mid-level versions of Suzuki SX4 are configured with 15 inches steel wheels. The 195/65 R15 size tires are fitted in all versions. Whereas, the top version of SX4 arrives outfitted with 16-inches alloy wheels wrapped with puncture-resistant tubeless wheels.
So, the 205/60 R16 size of wheels provides the overall balance and drive quality of the car. Still, these wheels seem oversized in balance to the rest of their design. The rear seems mature and strong with a rear bumper combined with double mirrors, rear defogger, wide windscreen, and tail lamp cluster. The build quality is more reliable than other sedans (2007-08 models) from this section.
Nissan X-trail vs Suzuki SX4: Driving
As a result of its size and motor choices, the Nissan X-Trail isn’t the greater part of an urban runabout however incredible on the open street and inside the harsh. Because it’s so tall, drivers have an excellent view, one in every of the largest greenhouses within the segment, which also puts it squarely within the “drive carefully” segment. In other words, the X-Trail isn’t a sports car, and can never corner sort of a sports car. On the opposite hand, no sports car features this sort of interior space and flexibility.
In ordinary driving, the X-Trail runs kind of a front-wheel-drive (FWD) vehicle. And it commonly runs somewhat more prudent than an indistinguishable back wheel drive (RWD) SUV, however, it’s not exactly streamlined body doesn’t afford an excessive amount of leeway during this respect. Just in case of poor on-road traction conditions, like snow or gravel, switching to all-wheel drive (AWD) mode. Turning the dial on the middle console from “2WD” to “AUTO” helps just somewhat. Because the framework doesn’t connect with the back wheels until lost footing is recognized at the front.
One could engage the “LOCK” system, effectively changing to 4WD mode, again at the turn of a dial. But this not suggested as this diverts over half the torque to the front axle. This can be fine for off-road and is sort of effective at delivering maximum traction, up to 18 mph, but driving on-road in LOCK mode for any length of your time would quickly result in driveline binding and possible damage.
When it comes to driving, the Suzuki SX4 seems awkward at a low or medium speed. The stability, balance, and support of the car are improved with its strong suspension system. Its front axle is advanced with the McPherson strut with an anti-roll bar and the rear one makes the torsion beam with gas-filled shock absorbers. Its Large wheels give an ideal grip over the roads. The ground extent of the top-end version is 180mm, maintaining it drive positively over the rough roads. Still, the ground clearance of all other versions (entry-level and mid-level models) is 170mm, which too assures high driving comfort on urban roads. The NVH levels of the SX4 are pretty impressive.
Further, the braking performance of the Suzuki SX4 is great, but the scope of modulation and tuning is yet there. All versions of the SX4 are provided with front ventilated disc brakes and rear drum brakes.
Suzuki SX4 Performance levels
So, the Suzuki SX4 Performance levels aren’t especially shocking. Suzuki succeeded the aging 107bhp 1.6-liter petrol engine with a 118bhp 1.6 in the autumn of 2010. The current engine is not very lively, giving 0-62mph in 10.7 seconds or a slowly 12.3 seconds if you opt for the slow-witted four-speed automatic gearbox. While it doesn’t give much in the way of low-down shove, this engine is fortunate to be revved hard, though you will see a consistent decrease in fuel economy. A four-wheel-drive version is available with the 1.6 petrol engine that examines off 0-62mph in 11.5 seconds and offers a nice case for itself as it’s significantly cheaper than the diesel model. A flexible drive boosts on uneven roads and the SX4 can deal more ably with off-road driving than most of its crossover rivals.
The diesel version of the SX4 is miles forward on the fuel efficiency front than its petrol unit. Further, its DOHC, 1.6-liter petrol engine gives a mileage of 9.3kmpl on city streets and 15kmpl on highways. However, it configured with the CRDi fuel supply system, intelligent gearing, and ECU calibration, the 1.3-liter DDiS diesel powertrain of the SX4 delivers 15kmpl in the city and 21.5kmpl on highways. So, this engine functions properly on low revs with less fuel consumption. Still, the fuel efficiency of the car is straight equivalent to driving style and multiple changes.
Side by Side Comparison
|Features||Nissan X-trail||Suzuki SX4|
|Power||84 – 134 kW||67 – 112 kW|
|Horsepower||114 – 183 hp||91 – 152 hp|
|Rev. at Max Power||600 – 6000||3500 – 6200|
|Torque||142 – 280||89 – 236|
|Rev. at Max Torque||1750 – 4800||1500 – 4400|
|Displacement||1332 – 2488 cc||998 – 1995 cc|
|Cylinders||4||3 – 4|
|Bore||72.2 – 89.9 mm||73 – 84 mm|
|Stroke||79.5 – 100 mm||78 – 90.4 mm|
|Compression Ratio||9.5 – 16.7 :1||9.5 – 18.1 :1|
|Synchronization||Timing Chain||Timing Belt Timing Chain|
|Type of Combustion Engine||Piston||Piston|
|Drivetrain||2WD | 4WD||2WD | 4WD|
|Type of Four Wheel Drive||4WD | AWD||4WD | AWD|
|Transmission||Automatic | Manual||Automatic | Manual|
|Type of Automatic||CVT | Dual-clutch||CVT | Dual-clutch|
|Fuel||Petrol | Diesel||Petrol | Diesel | Natural Gas (CNG)|
|Cargo Capacity||405 – 610||324 – 670|
If you are looking to buy Japanese Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts from Japan. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Please visit our website: www.japanesecartrade.com
Check more useful blog pages: blog.japanesecartrade.com/blog