Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix: The Toyota Auris is a compact car obtained from the Toyota Corolla, produced and marketed by Toyota. Launched in 2006, the first generation three/five-door hatchback shared the platform with the E150 series Corolla, while the second-generation five-door hatchback and Station Wagon named “Touring Sports” utilizes the E180 platform. The “Auris” title is based on the Latin word for “gold”, “aurum”.
The Honda Edix is a six-passenger compact multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) that was produced by Honda from 2004-2009 (with shopping ending in 2011 in some regions), over a single generation. The Edix is recorded for its 3+3 seating configuration, along with the Fiat Multipla.
Let’s start the comparison of Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix and find out what these vehicles have to offer as well as where they compete with each other in various aspects you are going to find below.
Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix: Overview
Auris has been derived from the Toyota Corolla. It’s a compact hatchback. The primary generation was started with Corolla and also the second had a compact five-door hatchback and beach wagon. A more luxurious Auris was named Toyota Blade in Japan.
We can see Auris could be a car you’ll anticipate driving. Toyota Auris is meant with bold, dynamic styling and spacious, intuitive interior that caters to each demand of consumers.
With the new Auris Bi-tone, Toyota ensures that clients will undoubtedly knock some people’s socks off, and with the decision of Toyota’s responsive half and half powertrain and propelled motor choices, the proper drive for what customers need.
Intelligent packaging – possibly motivated by the Fiat Multipla – has provided Honda a six-seat people transporter that can also stock baggage for all its residents, delivering it more efficiently than similar-sized people transporters that have three rows of seats but a small boot. The Edix seats three abreast in two rows, but the middle rear seat also pushes back to assure adequate legroom.
It suggests six people plus baggage can be carried in a vehicle taking up no more drive space than a regular family hatchback. Nevertheless, the central seat in the front isn’t really effective, particularly not for general usage. In 2007 the model got the great i-CTDi diesel engine it seriously required while the appearances were also subtly tweaked with new headlights and rear light clusters.
Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix: Interior
What strikes most from the driver’s seat is the volume of space. It’s pretty tall for a hatch, so there’s certainly loads of headroom, but there’s also loads of shoulder and foot room – there’s loads of space throughout the pedals too, and a big clutch footrest. Toyota has provided the interior an innovative appearance by moving the handbrake and gear lever much higher than they normally would be.
The driving position is great though as the steering wheel coordinates for height and reach and there’s an improvement in the driver’s seat. Clarity could be better – fat windscreen pillars obstruct the view, despite the fitting of a tinier ‘quarterlight’ window. A neat touch is the raised LED information screens by the speedometer – they’re straightforward to read and seem smart.
There’s lots of room in the back for three with a near-flat floor for more foot capacity and an effective amount of legroom. All cars have air conditioning to control the interior temperature, while top models have dual-zone climate control, which provides two separate sections of the cabin to be separate temperatures. Wind sound is managed low, but the engine and road sound is particularly nosy, especially on diesel models.
As you’d demand of a modern Honda, the quality of the interior surface is top class with high-grade elements utilized everywhere. It’s not the most fashionable or modern of cabins but everything is properly placed out with the stereo and air conditioning controls located high up in the middle of the center console. Still, the raked rear screen reduces rear clarity (particularly when it’s entirely filled), and the rounded rear glass changes the appearance resembling back.
Unlike some people vectors, every passenger onboard takes a full-size single seat (as opposed to a table seat). They’re spacious enough for more distant trips, and the central seat in the front and back can slide to assure both residents have ample legroom. Nevertheless, utilizing the central seat in the front indicates there’s inadequate shoulder room for the driver and passenger – so the driver ends up pushed facing the door.
Thankfully, on the road, the Edix is – on the whole – pretty smooth with engine and road sound held low, although wind sound can be nosy at higher speeds.
Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix: Engine
Toyota Auris performance isn’t expressly charming and although the series basically kicked off with a 96bhp 1.4-liter petrol, most purchased the more potent 122bhp 1.6-liter. It’s a good option, both active and responsive. The diesel range, meantime, began with the tiny 89bhp 1.4-liter that equalizes 56mpg, although it isn’t unusually agile to quicken or competent of a quick top speed.
The more potent 130bhp 2.0-liter D-4D punches a better agreement between practical performance and great economy. At 61mpg, it delivers better fuel economy than the shorter 1.4 diesel. Opposite the clock, the 2.0-liter diesel touches 62mph in 10.3 seconds. The top-of-the-range diesel is quicker still with the 180bhp 2.2-liter racing to 62mph in 8.1 seconds.
At the edge of 2008, a 1.33-liter VVT-i engine superseded the 1.4-liter petrol. It boasts enhanced power with 100bhp yet is considerably more efficient with an ordinary fuel economy of 49mpg as opposed to 41mpg in the 1.4-liter. This is supported by a stop/start system that cuts the engine in motionless traffic and the technology also supports cut CO2 emissions, giving it cheaper to accuse.
In 2009 the resting engines were all tweaked to improve efficiency as a component of Toyota’s Optimal Drive technology. The 1.4-liter diesel now produces 60mpg and 125g/km CO2 with the standard six-speed gearbox. A fresh 1.6-liter petrol engine (identified as Valvematic) returned the past VVT unit and it’s not only extra strong but better on fuel too. Don’t assume vivacious performance from the 2010 134bhp HSD variant, though.
The Edix was begun with a variety of petrol engines – a 123bhp 1.7-liter VTEC and a 148bhp 2.0-liter. Both employ Honda’s shifting valve timing VTEC engine technology, which provides magnificent performance when you’ve got your foot down, but better economy when you’re traveling. The 1.7 runs 0-62mph in 11.9 seconds and has a top speed of 112mph while the 2.0-liter gives lightly stabler performance, going to 62mph in 10.2 seconds.
Both these engines were superseded by a particular 140bhp 1.8-liter through 2007 which is more efficient. Still, it is the best i-CTDi engine (founded in 2007) which is clearly the pick of the range, particularly if you always have to travel extended lengths with a full capacity of passengers on board. There are loads of low-down towing power at low revs, suggesting it’s a comfortable ship or competent tow car, but it functions well too, running 62mph in 10.1 seconds.
A dashboard-mounted gearstick gives small, quiet turns while an automatic choice appeared in 2007 with the 1.8-liter petrol engine. It’s an automated manual sooner than a conventional auto, which is excellent for fuel bills, yet, regularity and responsiveness endure.
Gratitude to a low middle of gravity, Honda has been prepared to provide the Edix a reasonably effortless suspension set-up without jeopardizing its body control. It’s quite a broad car related to most people transports this size, which can be difficult when negotiating width restrictors but out on the street it’s simple to drive and move with light steering – the only difficulty is the rather heavy rear pillars which can create equal or reverse parking complex.
Toyota Auris vs Honda Edix: Fuel Economy & MPG
The Auris isn’t bargain-basement inexpensive to purchase but does serve great value in terms of the build quality, convenience, and stuff you get for the funds. Plus it retains its worth better than nearly any other car on the market now. After three years you should receive approximately 40% back of the listing cost. Low insurance groups – beginning at group 4 for the 1.4-liter and 1.33-liter models – should make the value of cover down while service periods are very well aligned at every 20,000 miles.
There’s average fuel economy from all engines and also a symbol on the dashboard that informs you when to change up (or down) to get the biggest economy. If affordable Toyota Auris running expenses are your preference you’ll opt for the 74mpg (claimed) HSD.
The conventionally powered Auris models, though, score very strong on the eco front and all of the engines in the series emit respectably low levels of CO2 while delivering a healthy economy. In 2009 the Auris’s standard engines were tweaked to be even more effective while the 1.33-liter begins with a stop/start system to decrease emissions (and increase the economy) moreover.
In terms of list cost, the Edix begins higher than alternative people transporters, but it is especially well created and amply furnished too. Insurance is consistent with ratings of either group 10 or 11, depending on what trim you go for while Honda servicing, although not always the most affordable around, is normally fair worth for money and great quality.
The Edix functions pretty well on the eco front, but it advanced significantly with the initiation of the 1.8-liter petrol engine, taking down common CO2 emissions. Nevertheless, most consumers prefer the premium diesel, with CO2 emissions of 167g/km and an economy of 45mpg – effective for a 140bhp people transporter.
Honda is a family title when it appears to reliability. The Edix is very strong made, has specific panel holes, and utilizes high-grade elements everywhere. There’s no reason to think that any of the engines will provide anything other than the first-class authenticity. That covers the diesel, which was attached to the Honda series in 2004.
Side by Side Comparison
|Features||Toyota Auris||Honda Edix|
|Riding Capacity (Person)||5||6|
|Wheel Base (mm)||2600||2680|
|Tires Front Tread (mm)||1515||1545|
|Tires Rear Tread (mm)||1505||1550|
|Ground Clearance (mm)||140||155|
|Minimum Turning Radius (m)||5.4||5.2|
|CylinderConfig||Line Engine4Moteur||Line Engine4Moteur|
|Maximum power||105 – 147ps||130 – 162ps|
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com