Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: The Toyota Noah, a seven or eight-seat minivan with two rear sliding doors manufactured by Toyota and marketed essentially in Asian countries. It is located beneath the Estima and Alphard, and beyond the Sienta. It succeeds the LiteAce/TownAce Noah, holding the “R” model code and generation valuation.
Let’s start the comparison of Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona and find out what these minivans have to offer. And where they compete with each other in terms of Interior, exterior, engine, and many other aspects you can find below.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Overview
Toyota Noah consists of two rear sliding doors with a seating capacity of 7-8 people. It was sold in many Asian countries. Noah was launched in three separate generations. The first generation of Toyota Noah was launched in November 2001 but it was discontinued in June 2007. Later it was further modified by Toyota and was again launched in June 2007.
The second-generation again discontinued in January 2014. After making further modifications, Toyota introduced the third-generation Noah in January 2014. It equipped with an engine start-stop system to improve fuel economy. Along with Noah, Toyota also introduced the improved version of Voxy and Esquire which considered as the luxury version of Noah. Later all these three models received facelift because Toyota made different significant changes.
In the minivan game, the Kia Sedona doesn’t really stack up toward section commanders. Its elegant styling provides it a sort of SUV look that deviates from the very vanny forms of the Chrysler Pacifica and Honda Odyssey, but its cabin requires the versatility that both of those competitors give. It’s falling behind in the driver-assistance field as well; none of Kia’s high-tech accident-avoidance tech is available on the base model, for example, and that material resides optional on the mid-range EX. That stated, the Sedona is a fair price position between minivans: The base model gives lots of standard convenience highlights, and the top-spec SX gives a truly upscale experience, boasting reclining second-row lounge seats with footrests.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Interior
The inside of the 2009 Toyota Noah is straightforward, giving a driver feels that one regularly connects with extravagance vehicles. All controls are within easy reach of the driving force, removing the requirement of your eyes from the road to work and control. The Noah features power seats and windows. Seating well arranged for simple access to the third row of seating, a particular bonus when transporting children or clients.
The Noah highlights single-contact double sliding side entryways, making inside access much progressively helpful. The gear shifter is found just to the left of the handwheel; with the handbrake in easy reach just underneath. Audio controls are located on the handwheel. The 2009 Noah is provided with the G-Book telematics framework that shows all data. This data is may require during a visit. Cargo capacity is further increased by a hidden sub-compartment underneath the rear hold.
While not as fashionable as Kia’s latest interior layouts, the Sedona’s cabin is at the slightest roomy. Luxury-minded users will want to see the top-spec SX, with its reclining driver’s seats in the position of the second-row bench. First- and second-row passengers will find loads of room to expand out; tinier kids will be fine in the third row, but grown-up kids may sense the pressure. All models arrive with a two-tone color theme that breaks up what might oppositely be a single black interior.
The materials seem high quality, but they could help from some cushioning or soft-touch covers on the armrests and middle console. In our examination of freight room, the Sedona fell compact of all of its competitors by a broad boundary due to its second-row seats that turn and slide but cannot be withdrawn or stowed on the ground. The Small-item area is good, especially for front-seat passengers, but it whitens in contrast to what the Pacifica offers.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Exterior
The exterior of the Toyota Noah is useful, yet fascinating. In an age when aerodynamic form dominates, the Noah stands out by featuring a pointy, box-like bonnet, kind of like that found in many of the offerings from Toyota’s Scion badge. Despite the box-like nose, the Noah is extremely aerodynamic and features several items to scale back air resistance.
In past ages, the Noah body was one shading, while the trim was another. The 2009 Toyota Noah is monochromatic, with the body and trim coordinating. Larger in every way compared to the Toyota LiteAce Noah that it replaced, the Toyota Noah has the more family-oriented appearance many young parents desire.
Kia has achieved something here: Unlike your average minivan, the Kia Sedona succeeds to disguise its exterior to such an intensity that it can come across as a crossover SUV from specific angles. The side profile provides away that this is a great people carrier, but the front and rear end both seem pleasantly SUV-like. Even in base form, Kia performs sure that the Sedona seems moderately upscale with standard hallmarks such as body-colored door handles (chrome on the SX) and a detailed rear spoiler.
A black mesh grille does work on the LX and EX, succeeded by a dark metallic mesh grille on the SX. This trim also receives a power sunroof as pennant and LED headlights and taillights in the position of the projector beam clusters on lower trims. Wheel sizes start at 17 inches for LX models, while both the EX and SX wear 18-inch alloys decorated in silver and machine surface, individually. These are also the only two trims with conventional roof rails.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Performance & Fuel Economy
A 2ZR-FXE 1.8-liter Atkinson cycle combustion engine, developed and evolved from the third-generation Prius, together with a class-first full hybrid system (THS II with reduction gear) delivers excellent environmental performance for this class, with a fuel economy of 23.8 km/L and CO2 emissions of 98 g/km under the MLIT JC08 test cycle. The hybrid battery is placed below the front seat, building a pleasant traveling space, tremendous baggage space, and excellent user-friendliness that only a minivan can accommodate.
The 2.0-liter 3ZR-FAE engine model utilizes an advanced Valvematic engine with the new Super CVT-i and other characteristics, which allows it to produce a class-leading environmental performance for gasoline engine models, with the fuel efficiency of 16.0 km/L and CO2 emissions of 145 g/km under the MLIT JC08 test cycle for two-wheel-drive models with idling-stop).
The new Super CVT-i commits to increased fuel efficiency within a class-leading gear-ratio range with a two-port oil pump system optimizing energy consumption to the driving requirements and an electric oil pump combined with the idling-stop.
Both the 1.8-liter hybrid system model and the 2.0-liter engine model (two-wheel and four-wheel drive3 models with idling-stop) beat MLIT’s 2015 fuel economy standards by 20 percent4. Being confirmed as having emissions that are 75 percent cheaper than the 2005 standards following the MLIT’s Approval System for Low-emission Vehicles*5 makes these models qualified for decreased taxes under the Japanese government’s tax system for environment-friendly vehicles.
Sleek and elegant, the Sedona’s V-6 is well suited to its people-moving mission and unusually carries any harshness into the cabin. Around-town driving is stress-free, but running the Sedona up to highway speeds needs plentiful usage of the gas pedal. This Kia manages effectively but doesn’t motivate backroad rowdiness—it is a minivan, after all.
Unlike the Toyota Sienna, all-wheel drive is not a choice here; not is a hybrid powertrain, which will soon be a standard innovation in the Toyota van. The Sedona’s trip is composed over the quiet highway, but it doesn’t cover up rough surfaces the very way the Chrysler Pacifica does. The heft of the steering wheel appears just right—not too bulky, not too light—and the Sedona is simply maneuverable at parking-lot speeds. Overall, we like the setup, even if the steering doesn’t present a great deal of feedback.
The Sedona is considered by the EPA at 18 mpg city and 24 mpg highway. We haven’t had the opportunity to place a model throughout our highway fuel-economy examination, but a model of this generation passed a decent (but rather class-leading) 25 mpg. When associated with our long-term Chrysler Pacifica, which achieved 33 mpg, Sedona’s performance is unsatisfactory.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Driving Experience
Early MPVs suffered from steering and handling issues. Often they felt top-heavy and drivers reported feeling as if they MPV might basketball shot a good corner or during a high-speed turn. The Toyota Noah counters these obsolete ideas by offering an even ride that handles especially under every single driving condition.
The Noah debunks another myth about MPVs by being quite adequately powered. The 1986cc motor highlighted inside the units with model code DBA-ZRR70W produces 143 bhp and 196 N-m of torque. Being under the square engine, full torque is obtainable at 4400 RPMs. Units with the DBA-ZRR70W designation are front-wheel drive vehicles, allowing them to produce a fuel rating of 13.4 km/l. Units with full-time four-wheel drive are still ready to achieve 12.6 km/l, partly thanks to the under square engine setup.
Kia nailed it when it becomes to how the Sedona rides and handles. Steering is surprisingly straightforward and it reacts well to fast inputs. Which is great when you require to withdraw road accidents.
Drive quality is steady and pleasant, an beautiful quality for a people transport such as this. What amazed us most is what happened when we got it into a set of twisty streets. The Sedona manages it balance when tossed around, and the SX with standard high-performance shocks appears completely competent. Highway cruising appears steady and predictable. Overall, we pleasingly amazed by how well this car drives.
Toyota Noah vs Kia Sedona: Final Words
When seeing a 2009 Toyota Noah the MPVs look very changed, yet offer a large number of indistinguishable comforts to purchasers. Both vehicles appeal to a large demographic within the overall public. And offer the flexibility for the transportation and hospitality industries to form use of them still.
Both models can provide superior fuel economy when viewing units with front-wheel drive. On the other hand, each is made by an automaker that’s well-known for its dependability and longevity. Thus, the Toyota Noah may have a small approach to this area. Providing the dependability of all Toyota models is known across the globe; however, this is often a highly subjective difference and depends on your point of view. Certainly, deciding on which to shop for is more a matter of private preference and brand confidence.
The Kia Sedona is one of the older minivans in its division. Yet the family hauler gains some points with its satisfactory first- and second-row seats. As well as its comprehensive creation comforts in SX guise. Kia’s minivan also gives comfortable driving dynamics, with excellent body control and a flexible drive. The dominant V-6 engine gives good power, too, and doesn’t seem lacking when you accelerate.
One of Kia Sedona’s foremost weaknesses is the way the second and third rows work when you require to move them around. They’re heavy to stow and restrict the minivan’s versatility. The second row, in particular, can’t be excluded besides for the middle position. Giving the Sedona less family-friendly than opponents like the Chrysler Pacifica and Toyota Sienna.
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com