When you’re shopping for a new compact crossover or SUV car from Japan, you have lots of selections today. Foremost with your viable choices are the Chevrolet Equinox vs Toyota RAV4. Both of those compact crossover utility Japanese vehicles, or CUVs, advance effective performance, flexible handling, and grand seating space, and cargo volume.
While you may favor the fashion and pleasant trim levels of one of these CUVs over the different, you owe it to yourself to examine them more in higher aspects. We’re assured that you’ll be impressed by Chevy Equinox’s value statement accompanying its stellar standard and available features!
Toyota RAV4 vs Chevrolet Equinox: Performance
The RAV4 cars from Japan utilize a 203-hp 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine matched with an eight-speed automatic transmission. The front-wheel-drive stays standard, but Toyota now gives a choice of all-wheel-drive systems, conditioned on trim.
The Japanese used cars RAV4 are determined to be faster than its ancestor. The devoted four-cylinder can be loud, particularly when highway-passing efforts and the transmission appeared to flounder when called upon for a downshift. The RAV4 Hybrid caught off an even quicker 7.4-second 60-mph time. Japan used car RAV4 seems reliable and durable when traveling the interstate and holds its own when pitched into a twisty segment of road.
Underpowered and constantly out of breathing, the base turbo four-cylinder engine won’t gain any fans with its slow performance. The turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder produces 170 horsepower, and when matched with the optional (and heavier) all-wheel-drive system (front-wheel drive is standard), it takes a heavy base to push the Equinox up to highway speeds.
A larger, turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder is optional and far excellently suited to Equinox’s mass. The standard six-speed automatic shifts seamlessly, and in the importance of fuel economy, the gearbox is hesitant to downshift if extra energy is required. Friendly and easy to drive, the Equinox manages effectively, and its steering is precise and straightforward. The ride is a bit firm, especially with the optional 19-inch wheels (17s or 18s are standard). The Chevy can also tow up to 3500 pounds when accurately equipped.
Toyota RAV4 vs Chevrolet Equinox: Interior
Under, the RAV4 prioritizes ergonomics and cubby storage. A helpful shelf crosses the dash and complements the wide center console. It features a mix of soft-touch coverings and nice substitutes. The base trim, called LE, is pretty spartan and appears with cloth seats, a plasticky steering wheel, and single-zone manual climate control. On the next-step-up XLE, Toyota tosses in a few perks, but there’s considerably more to like on the XLE Premium, including faux-leather upholstery, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and shift knob, and a stitched and stuffed dashboard and center-console armrest. The RAV4’s rear seats are straightforward to stow, and they open to a nearly flat position, opening up the cabin for cargo.
Manufactured from long-lasting elements and beautifully styled, Equinox’s cabin should encourage broad interest. Both front- and rear-seat passengers should get themselves comfortable in the roomy interior, with plenty of extravagances to keep the content on lengthier trips. Further, the cabin highlights lots of cupholders, but most interior luxuries appear as conventional or voluntary equipment on higher trim levels, the base Equinox L is a value head with very few characteristics. Apart from a spacious center-console storage bin, Equinox’s cabin storage is solely common.
Toyota RAV4 vs Chevrolet Equinox: Fuel Economy
The RAV4 received class-competitive fuel-economy measures from the EPA. Front-wheel-drive RAV4s can endure up to an evaluated 35 mpg on the highway. However, the all-wheel-drive Venture produced 32 mpg on a 200-mile highway fuel-economy range, 1 mpg modest of the EPA’s expected rating for that trim.
The EPA considers that the front-wheel-drive Equinox with the base four-cylinder will obtain 26 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway. Combining an all-wheel-drive decreases both ratings by 1 mpg. The shift to the larger four-cylinder engine and its fuel-economy measures drop to 22 mpg city and 29 highway for front-drive models. So, the smaller engine with front-wheel drive delivered 32 mpg on the highway and 28 mpg with the all-wheel-drive version. Also, it is outfitted with the bigger engine and all-wheel drive, the Equinox managed 30 mpg.
Side by Side Comparison
|Popular Powertrains||Toyota RAV4||Chevrolet Equinox|
|Engine||2.5-liter I-4||1.5-liter turbo I-4|
|Horsepower||203 hp @ 6,600 rpm||170 hp @ 5,600 rpm|
|Torque||184 lb-ft @ 5,000 rpm||203 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm|
|Transmission||8-spd automatic||6-spd automatic|
|Fuel Economy||30 mpg (27 city/35 hwy)||28 mpg (26 city/31 hwy)|
|Also Available||2.5-liter I4 hybrid and PHEV; AWD||AWD|
|NHTSA Overall Safety||5 stars||5 stars|
|Max Seating Capacity||5||5|
|Wheelbase||105.9 inches||107.3 inches|
|Overall Length||180.9 inches||183.1 inches|
|Width||73.0 inches||72.6 inches|
|Height||67.0 inches||65.4 inches|
|Turning Diameter||36.1 feet||37.4 feet|
|Headroom, Front||37.7 inches||40.0 inches|
|Headroom, Rear||39.5 inches||38.5 inches|
|Legroom, Front||41.0 inches||40.9 inches|
|Legroom, Rear||37.8 inches||39.7 inches|
|Shoulder Room, Front||57.8 inches||57.2 inches|
|Shoulder Room, Rear||56.4 inches||55.5 inches|
|EPA Passenger Volume||98.9 cu. ft.||103 cu. ft.|
|EPA Cargo Volume||37.5/69.8 cu. ft.||29.9/63.9 cu. ft.|
If you are looking to buy Japanese Used Cars, Machinery, Bus, Trucks, Parts from Japan. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Please visit our website: www.japanesecartrade.com
Check more useful blog pages: blog.japanesecartrade.com/blog