Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: The Toyota RAV4 is a compact crossover SUV (sport utility vehicle) manufactured by the Japanese automobile producer Toyota. The vehicle was designed for customers desiring a vehicle that had most of the advantages of SUVs, such as improved freight scope, greater clarity, and the possibility of full-time four-wheel drive, along with the maneuverability and fuel economy of a compact car.
On the other hand, The Ford Everest is a mid-size body-on-frame sport utility vehicle (SUV) manufactured by the Ford Motor Company since 2003. It is based on the Ford Ranger pickup truck, and it was advanced and designed essentially for the Asia-Pacific region.
Let’s start the comparison and find what both SUVs have to offer and where they give the competition to each other or any other SUV in the market.
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: Engine
The fifth-generation 2018 Toyota Rav4 houses a 2.5-liter engine with a four-cylinder and sixteen valves at 2400 cc capacity. It can generate power up to 176 hp at 6000 revolutions per minute. This engine was designed with adventure in mind and you can easily take it on a ride for your random wanderings and trekkings.
The new-generation twin-turbo engine – 157kW at 3750rpm and 500Nm from 1750rpm-2000rpm – is joined with a 10-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, the very sequence as used in Ford’s high-performance models, Mustang and Raptor.
But this effective combination is a more suitable union here, in the Everest, than it is in the Raptor, in terms of the soft control of power and torque at low and high speeds, as well as making everything in an unfussed manner – low-key but still capable.
As suggested, the previous-gen 3.2-liter 143kW/470Nm five-cylinder turbo-diesel engine and six-speed auto are still given in Ambiente and Trend, assuring those who favor their engines bigger are provided for.
The Titanium has a full-time 4WD with low-range gearing (‘4×4 Low’) and electronic diff lock, as well as a ‘Terrain Management System’ with four driving modes (Normal, Grass/Gravel/Snow, Sand, and Rock) to accommodate various region.
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: Fuel Economy
The RAV4 earned class-competitive fuel-economy ratings from the EPA, but non-Adventure models are the foremost efficient, and hybrid ratings haven’t been released. Front-wheel-drive RAV4s are appraised at up to 35 mpg. Rated at 33 mpg, the journey model delivered only 32 mpg for us on our 200-mile highway fuel-economy route.
Best-of-the-bunch 2.0-litre fuel consumption is placed as 6.9L/100km (mixed) in the Trend RWD and 7.1L/100km (mixed) in the 4WD. We perceived a standard of 9.8L/100km on the dash but there may have been some massive right foot included in urging that figure.
The Everest has an 80-liter fuel tank.
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: Driving
At the center of each great Hybrid could be a smooth and refined gasoline-electric powertrain. The Escape is controlled by a 2.5-liter Atkinson-cycle inline-four and two engines/generators that join for 200 drives. This arrangement sets with a planetary gearset that impersonates an ordinary transmission, yet it’s an electronic ceaselessly factor programmed (CVT). The Toyota RAV4 uses a 2.5-liter inline-four coordinated with Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive.
However, an extra motor is mounted on the rear axle, which creates an all-wheel drive and a combined output of 219 horses; Ford’s all-wheel-drive system is of the standard mechanical variety. While both hybrids seamlessly transition between internal combustion and wattage, the Toyota’s engine is noisier than the Ford’s, and slight throttle inputs rouse it to act with greater regularity.
The torquier RAV4 is increasingly responsive at city speeds and hurried from zero to 60 mph in an exceedingly good 7.3 seconds—0.4 second speedier than its adversary. In any case, the Ford Escape gives a better passing force, quickening all the more rapidly from both 30 to 50 and 50 to 70 mph. As an aside, Ford presently can’t seem to discharge full subtleties for its up-and-coming Escape module half breed, yet the new 2021 RAV4 PHEV should sneak up all of a sudden with its combined 302-hp rating.
Of course, the foremost important metric to any hybrid owner is fuel economy. The EPA gives the electrically helped Escape and RAV4 practically indistinguishable appraisals. Both convey 40-mpg joined appraisals, yet the Ford includes a higher city gauge (43 mpg versus 41), and in this way, the Toyota includes a higher thruway rating (38 mpg versus 37). For setting, the thriftiest non-cross breed Escape appraised at 27 mpg city, 33 roadways, and 30 consolidated. The RAV4 comparable tops out at 26 mpg city, 35 parkway, and 30 joined. No matter badging, these hybrids should spend less time at the pump than their gas-only counterparts. In our mixed driving, we averaged 32 mpg within the Toyota and 30 mpg within the Ford.
While neither of those hybrids is particularly captivating to direct, the Escape feels progressively complex and simpler to control. Its fragile suspension assimilates thumps and its cabin calms outside uproar well indeed. The RAV4 feels more sort of a legitimate SUV. Thanks partially to its much higher seating position and eight.1 inches of ground clearance. It can also tow up to 1750 pounds, which may be a tad over the Escape hybrid’s 1500-pound maximum. The tradeoff for Toyota’s greater capability may be a flintier ride on uneven roads. And a softer treadle that had inconsistent feedback compared with the Ford. The RAV4 crossover likewise required an extra 15 feet to keep from 70 mph at the test track. Dealing with the accomplishment in an exceedingly not really good or bad 182 feet.
The Everest’s 2.0-liter is not performing to make any beats beating with its engine notes, that’s for certain, but it more than gains up for any loss of sharp, gutsy beauty – observed or differently – by being the absolute close achiever. Because it is very smooth … and it performs.
The good news is that we accelerated the 2477kg Titanium much tough off the point, as well as created a group of overtaking movements and measured up a bit of open-road cruising and it just burbled forward carefully. There’s a real no-fuss quality to its performance of large torque at low revs. It surely looks to work strongly in the Everest than in the Raptor, which we drove at launch a few weeks ago and the agreement there was that it was underpowered and underwhelming.
The Everest is also very calm inside. Ford considers the twin-turbo is “much calmer” than their 3.2-liter models due to superior sound isolating and ‘Active Noise Cancellation’ which has served to enhance cabin quietness. Well, the 3.2 is much calm anyhow, but in the little time I’ve given so far in the twin-turbo Everest, I have no intention not to consider them.
Its steering has that real Ford response – light and cheery but accurate – and on its improved coil-spring suspension, the Titanium’s ride and handling are even sleeker than earlier. It was firm, bordering on stiff at times, but maybe the Titanium’s 20-inch rims on road-biased Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV tires set at 38 psi could be accused of any of that; 18 x 8.0-inch alloy wheels and wheels are a no-cost alternative on the Titanium.
We did some straight 4WDing on this launch out near Lithgow and the Everest was occasionally challenged everywhere near the limits of its off-roading abilities.
We purposely drove our tester in Standard mode and used the ‘off’ line into segments of the area that would have possibly place some competitors in a spot of trouble but, with proper use of that 10-speed auto, notably that low first, we trucked into no problem.
The Everest’s hill slide control earns a notice also as it’s rather soft and efficient; it holds very low speeds (registering as 0km/h on the dash), can be improved via switches on the steering wheel, and was not jerky or jarring like some systems in another off-roader can be.
When we did dial within the drive modes of the terrain management system to suit the cover we were driving on there was no wonder at how effective and efficient it was, as we’ve used it pretty greatly before in the bush and onshore sand.
The Titanium has 227mm ground clearing. We witnessed a few Everests on strange terrain and, notably on deep sharp-edged ruts and short steeper-angled rocky slopes it’s underslung full-sized extra wheel behind the rear axle can look like it’s about to become a plow – and there’s something more to watch out for.
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: Safety
If the company has provided numerous facilities in this hybrid version, then how can they stay behind with safety measures! So, firstly there is a pre-collision system with pedestrian detection to help the driving in keeping safe on the road. After that, you can see the availability of full-speed range dynamic radar cruise control. Next, there is a lane departure alert with steering assist and automatic high beams. People also get the feature of lane tracing assist and road sign assist. All these safety features come under Toyota Safety Sense 2.0.
The Everest series has a five-star ANCAP rating as a result of testing carried in 2015.
Standard safety gear over the range comprises seven Airbags (driver and front passenger, side front, side curtain (to the third row), and driver’s knee), ABS, DSC, RSC, EBD, traction control, EBA, reversing camera, and rear parking sensors.
Driver-assist tech in the top-spec Titanium combines AEB, adaptive cruise control with forward-collision warning, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, and a tire pressure monitoring system.
It has five child-seat hook points and two ISOFIX anchors in the second row.
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Everest: Interior
The Toyota Rav4 can seat only 5 people as compared to 7 in the case of Toyota Vanguard. The passenger spacing is also quite constricted but the cargo space is fairly large and can easily fit all your tools and equipment for a family outing or any kind of shifting work.
Among the styling, tweaks are a new grille design, updated bumper, and fascia design, halogen projector headlights with halogen daytime running lights, a covered acoustic windscreen, a 10-speaker audio system, as well as an ‘blacky’ interior color scheme with adverse stitching and chrome highlights.
If there’s any possible conflict to the interior aspect and appear here, it may be that it’s too neat and tidy – too plain – and in danger of maturing a bit dated.
The Titanium has new 20-inch split-spoke alloy wheels.
Side by Side Comparison
|Features||Toyota RAV4||Ford Everest|
|Power||127 kW 131 kW||157 kW 143 kW|
|Power rpm To||6600 rpm 5700 rpm||3750 rpm 3000 rpm|
|Torque||203 Nm 221 Nm||500 Nm 470 Nm|
|Torque rpm To||4900 rpm 5200 rpm||2000 rpm 2500 rpm|
|Power to Weight Ratio||80.1 kW/t 96.7 kW/t 95.3 kW/t||68.7 kW/t 59.4 kW/t 65.8 kW/t|
|Engine Capacity (cc)||1987||2198|
|Number of Gears||CVT||6|
|Kerb Weight (kg)||1610||2305|
|Front Tyre||225/60 R18||265/60 R18|
|Rear Tyre||225/60 R18||265/60 R18|
|No Of Doors||5||5|
|Wheel Base||2690 mm||2850 mm|
|Front Tread||1610 mm||1560 mm|
|Rear Tread||1640 mm||1565 mm|
|Fuel Tank Capacity (litres)||55 L||80 L|
|Front Suspension||MacPherson Strut||Double Wishbone|
|Rear Suspension||Double Wishbone||Watts Link|
|Tyre Size||225/65 R17||265/60 R18|
|Alloy Wheel Size||17 Inch||18 Inch|
|Steering Gear Type||Rack & Pinion||Rack & Pinion|
|Adjustable Steering Column||Yes||Yes|
|Steering Column||Tilt & Telescopic||Adjustable|
|Steering Type||Electric Power||Electric Power|
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com