Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: The Toyota RAV4 is a compact crossover SUV (sport utility vehicle) manufactured by the Japanese automobile producer Toyota. This was the first compact crossover SUV; it began its introduction in Japan and Europe in 1994, and North America in 1995, being started in January 1996. Toyota of Japan also markets the longer-wheelbase variant as the Toyota Vanguard at Toyopet Store locations.
The Chevrolet Captiva is a compact crossover SUV produced by General Motors. The first generation was produced by GM Korea, based on the GM Theta platform, and received from the S3X Concepts Cars shown in 2004. The crossover rides the entry-level SUV sections. Issued in 2006, it was marketed globally as Chevrolet Captiva, in Australia and New Zealand as Holden Captiva, and in South Korea as Daewoo Windstorm until 2011, when the international title was used.
Let’s start the comparison of the Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva and find out what these Vehicles have to offer as well as where they compete with each other in various aspects you are going to find below.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Overview

The Toyota Vanguard began production as a compact middle-class SUV (Sports Utility Vehicle) initially produced to replace the Toyota Kluger V model. Certainly, Toyota Vanguard has a long body with a spacious cabin that allows for extra seating, and it comes in five- or seven-seat variants. The car’s overall dimensions are 4570 x 1855 x 1690 mm, and it is based on the third-generation Toyota RAV4 with a long wheelbase, which places it somewhere between the Toyota RAV4 and Toyota Kluger.
So, the Toyota Vanguard comes in 2 versions: the 240S and 350S. The 240S is a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine producing 170 horsepower at 22.5kgf-m. The 350S is slightly more developed, with a 3.5-liter six-cylinder engine producing around 280 horsepower at 35.1kgf-m. Both versions are equipped with a full-time four-wheel-drive (4WD). And a number of high-tech features including steering-assisted stability control, keyless entry, and advanced satellite navigation system.

The first-generation Chevrolet Captiva gave customers a lot of vehicles for their cash. It was a great, seven-seater SUV with strong diesel motors and proper off-road ability gratitude to its four-wheel-drive system. A facelift in 2011 began updated appearances and clarified the engine line-up down to just a particular diesel.
Two models are possible: an entry-level, five-seat, two-wheel-drive variant and a high-spec, seven-seat, four-wheel-drive one. Although all Captiva’s are pleasant and well decorated, they don’t attend the class when it becomes too efficient and the range-topping LTZ spec can be pretty pricey.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Exterior




The Toyota Vanguard has slim and robust headlights that curve around the sides of its front end, with an integrated bumper and fender signaling the car’s stability.
Moreover, it has 2 sculpted lines that combine with the fog lights, conveying a sense of both refinement and strength. So, the sides create a silhouette that smoothly flows from the hood to the roof and the rear spoiler, adding to its visual appeal.




The latest Chevrolet Captiva maintains the exterior layout of its ancestor. The SUV seems remarkable with numerous attractive design details. The vehicle’s sides are smooth and quiet with chrome grab door handles, chrome window line, and body-colored ORVMs for classy appearances.
Its sculpted wheel curves show off beautiful 17-inch alloys to continue its sporty charm. The top trim begins with a panoramic sunroof and satin silver roof railings. The SUV rear picture gets a strong rear spoiler, a fat chrome strip, body-colored bumper with silver polished body cladding for elegant style and continued protection.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Interior




The interior of the Toyota Vanguard SUV is spacious and comfortable. The door trimmings and the bronze-tone finish used on the center console add a taste of luxury finished off with comfortable seats. That in many models are made from a combination of genuine leather and Alcantara microfibre.




GM has given minor modifications to the Chevrolet Captiva’s cabin. For a refreshing new address, the SUV receives a new instrument cluster and the valuable cluster ionizer that causes atoms to have the cabin fresh and odor-free by cleaning and purifying.
The cabin is decorated in beautiful black color, premium leather, and ambient lighting. It appears to have a premium leather-wrapped steering wheel, gear knob, and parking lever; rear parking sensors, cruise control, combined 2-DIN audio system with eight speakers and Bluetooth connectivity; multi-functional steering wheel with attached audio and cruise controls, and many more.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Engine

The Toyota Vanguard 350S has a naturally aspirated six-cylinder engine that runs on petrol. And produces a maximum of 276 brake horsepower.
While the 240S produces an average of 170 brake horsepower and has a displacement capacity of 2362cc. However, the Toyota Vanguard has a 60-liter fuel tank capacity.

The model of the Chevrolet Captiva is powered by a powerful 2.2 liter, 4-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine that produces a max power of 184 bhp and a peak torque of 424 Nm. The engine is linked with either a 6-speed manual transmission or a 6-speed automatic transmission gearbox.
A more rigid suspension and more solid anti-roll bars were among the profits obtained as part of the 2011 facelift to enhance Captiva’s handling. You still wouldn’t describe it as a fun vehicle to drive, though. Although the Captiva manages well, it requires the balance of the best handling SUVs on the market. On the plus side, the 2.2-liter diesel engine is sleek and sturdy in either 161bhp or 182bhp form.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Performance

The Toyota Vanguard has more power and gives higher stability as compared to the RAV4. This 270 HP powerful performance makes Vanguard more dominant in comparison to Rav4.

The premium SUV is decorated slowly with special goodies which along with a potent engine give a great performance. The vehicle also gives excellent handling on all kinds of terrains.
Models with four-wheel-drive get approved hill-descent control and grip better in unsafe conditions but aren’t noticeably faster than the two-wheel drives. We usually prefer manual gearboxes, but the Captiva’s notchy six-speed manual transmission involves the automatic is the one to go for here, even if it can hardly be reluctant to respond.
Toyota Vanguard vs Chevrolet Captiva: Fuel Efficiency

The 2.0-liter petrol model maintains official mixed cycle fuel consumption of 6.8 liters per 100 kilometers for the manual and 6.5L/100km for the auto. We’ve left you to estimate the km/l numbers! The fuel economy for the 2WD hybrid is 4.7L/100km, while the AWD utilizes a claimed 4.8L/100km -two new petrol benchmarks for the section. It’s like an endless eco mode! Fuel usage for the Edge’s AWD 2.5L engine is 7.3L/100km – this engine is solely in the Edge model, yet it still sells most of its competitors with similarly-sized engines and AWD. The fuel tank volume is 55 liters in size beyond all models, but it’s pleasant to state your mileage will alter based on the drivetrain.

This SUV manual modification gives a mileage of up to 14.6 Kmpl, while its automatic modification produces up to 12.12 Kmpl. As a huge, heavy SUV, the Captive is unsurprisingly costly to run, with moderately high discharges and lower fuel economy. The lower-powered entry-level model should deliver around 44mpg and releases 170g/km of CO2, but if you prefer an automatic gearbox, those numbers fall to 36.6mpg and 203g/km individually.
Side by Side Comparison
Features | Toyota Vanguard | Chevrolet Captiva |
Displacement(cc) | 2362 | 2,400 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline/Petrol |
Transmission | CVT | Automatic |
Drive System | AWD | AWD |
Doors | 5 | 5 |
Riding Capacity (Person) | 5 | 7 |
Weight (kg) | 1600 | 1981 |
Length (mm) | 4570 | 4673 |
Width (mm) | 1855 | 1870 |
Height (mm) | 1685 | 1755 |
Wheel Base (mm) | 2660 | 2705 |
Tires Front Tread (mm) | 1570 | 1567 |
Tires Rear Tread (mm) | 1570 | 1576 |
Ground Clearance (mm) | 190 | 176 |
Minimum Turning Radius (m) | 5.6 | 5.8 |
If you are looking to buy Japan Used Cars, Bus, Trucks, Machinery, Parts. We provide high-quality used vehicles directly from Japan.
Send us inquiry to buy Cars from Japan Auto Auctions.
Check hundreds of Trusted Japan Car Exporter at JapaneseCarTrade.com