Toyota Vitz vs Toyota Belta

For a protracted time, supermini cars are cheap – cheaply made, cheaply designed, and cheaply constructed. However, when Toyota Vitz shows up, all vehicle proprietors must change that observation.

The mechanics create a Toyota Vitz’s interior from top-of-the-range materials. The centrist board is extremely convenient and attractive.

However, it gives a sense of control that one might not find in other supermini cars. Toyota Vitz has basic and plain inside lines, helping the main impetus to focus during the drive.

The Toyota Belta has progressed in size over the earlier generation such that its interior volume is relative to the E120 series Toyota Corolla. From a safety viewpoint, the Belta puts the XX meter in the center of the dash. The seats are spacious enough to support even lengthy drives. Another great feature of the Belta is that it has a somewhat more precise feel to the Vitz clearly because it’s a sedan.

Surprisingly, the cabin space grants loads of room for accommodation and can comfortably accommodate a golf bag.

Both cars make an impactful external look that’s better than most cars within the supermini segment while the driving force compares. While Toyota Vitz brags a couple of slightly higher wheelbases moreover as boot space.

Interestingly, both Japanese car makers seem to own perfected the design of their respective cars. They use tear headlights and guards that are exceptional and unique. While Toyota Vitz looks a touch square-shaped.

The Toyota Belta was issued in 2005. And as the name means “Beauty” in Italian, the design is simplistic and richer than any other Toyota compact car. The size is 4,300 mm long, 1,690 mm wide, and 1460 mm tall. This presents the Belta is insignificantly shorter than the Corolla, holding true to its character as size the “smallest sedan” in Japan.

Excess to refer to, however, inside the Toyota Vitz examination, the motor and subsequently the eco-friendliness for the autos during this section can represent the deciding moment of the product.

However, the engine available ranges from 1 Liter to 1.5 Litres starting with the basic B variant to the sporty RS variant featuring a sports package and minor cosmetic bits on its interior and minor tweaks to its suspension. The models which have automatic transmission adopt a 4WD (four-wheel-drive) layout while the manual version uses a standard front 2WD (two-wheel-drive) layout.

When the Belta was presented to the Japanese business, it was outfitted with a 1.0 to 1.3 L engine, essentially identical to the Vitz, although the 1.5 L 1NZ-FE engine is standard in the world business. The road sound is ok for this class, although the CVT can be loud during acceleration.

The fuel consumption is 22.0km / L for the 1L FF model and 19.6km / L for the 1.3L FF model (both are 10-15 mode fuel consumption) so it is a very low-fuel consumption car.

Driving Safety features are the essential peculiarities in today’s modern cars that provide secured driving pleasure for patrons. Toyota Vitz is specifically equipped with the latest technological features including an automatic brake pre-crash safety system, lane departure alert, automatic ray, drive start control, hand brake signal, vehicle stability control, footing control, electronic brake-power dispersion, stopping automation, SRS Airbags framework, and Toyota Security Sense C.

Conventional safety highlights combine airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, and head restraints for all seating positions. Side-impact airbags, side curtain airbags, and ABS are voluntary on 2007–2008 models. Starting in 2009, front and rear row side curtain airbags accompanying by front seat-mounted thorax side airbags and anti-lock brakes became standard. Stability control was unavailable on all models until the 2010 model year when it became standard.

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Belta sedan earned a “Good” overall score in the frontal crash test and a “Good” overall score in the side impact test on models outfitted with side airbags but a “Poor” overall score on models without side airbags. In their roof strength evaluation, the Belta is rated “Acceptable” with a strength-to-weight ratio of 3.78.